The BRUTAL conditions at our latest long-range benchrest competition made for some interesting retrospective observations about high-power air-rifle ballistics. However a bit of background information is required for perspective.
My local shooting club holds monthly Benchrest Silhouette competitions utilizing airgun-sized, 1/10 scale silhouettes shot at 60, 75, 90 and 100 yards (respectively) for the penny-sized chickens, mouse-sized pigs, quarter-sized turkeys (yes, at 90 yards), and rat sized rams. At my request, the Match Director agreed to include an airgun class in this RF competition. Shot from concrete bench rests in challenging outdoor wind conditions, the only shooting aids allowed are a simple sandbag under the fore-end (only). It's very challenging, especially for the airgunners (even with 100 foot-pound and .30 caliber limits).
The most successful airgun combination for this competition so far has been 34 grain, .25 caliber JSB Exact King pellets at about 900 FPS and 60 FP. The most successful RFs shoot 40 grain bullets about 1050 FPS/98 FP. Saturdays brutal winds provided interesting perspective on the exponential superiority of bullets over diabolo pellets.
Historically the (standard velocity) RFs shoot about 10-15% higher scores than the airguns in these matches; typical scores in 'normal' wind conditions being around 35 and 30 respectively (give or take about 2 points in each class). However, last Saturday we endured the most brutal windy (and cold) match conditions yet, shedding more perspective on the practical, exterior-ballistic differences between standard velocity RF bullets and high-power airguns using very high BC diabolo pellets.
The Airgun class high score in Saturdays brutal-winds competition was only 19/40, as opposed to the high RF score of 35/40. Both high scores were shot by the same experienced competitor giving his best efforts. The RF score must be considered very high for the conditions. But believe it or not (and trust me), so was the Airgun score very high given the brutal winds.
The 62% greater muzzle-energy of the .22 RF bullet is obviously quite an advantage over the (extremely-heavy) .25 pellet. However, the .035 ballistic coefficient of the pellet gives the .076 BC of the .22 bullet an almost laughable 217% advantage. Of course the BC advantage becomes ever more exponentially overwhelming the longer the range and windier the conditions.
For poignant example, at the 100 yard ram distance the .22 bullet is still going 900 FPS and carrying over 70 foot-pounds of energy; but the extreme-power .25 caliber pellet is only clocking 640 FPS and 31 foot-pounds. Due to the shuttle-cockish ballistic coefficient of diabolo pellets, the kinetic-energy advantage of the RF bullet has grown from 62% at the muzzle to 225% at 100 yards! Kinda puts the challenge of long range airgunning into more stark perspective, huh?
"It ain't for ever'body"... but everybody is invited. I'll try to attach details, and hope the attachment doesn't overwhelm site space.