AIRGUNGUIDE
Airgun Warriors Archive · Airgun Talk

Crosman 1720T Field Target Pistol with Scope ... Crossed the Rubicon - Again: My Third PCP Pistol

11 posts · November 26, 2020 · Archived from the original AirgunWarriors.com forum

This page preserves a discussion thread from the original AirgunWarriors.com community forum, reproduced here as originally written. If you're a contributor to this thread and would like something removed or credited differently, contact info@airgunguide.com.

This thread originally included member-uploaded photos. They were hosted externally and are no longer available, so they've been omitted below.

REFERENCE:  
Crosman 1720T Field Target Pistol with Iron-Sights ... Crossed the Rubicon - Again: My Second PCP Pistol

Well, I followed-through and purchased a second 1720T for use with a scope.
In this case I decided to mount a Leapers 3-12X32 Bug Buster optic.
I decided not-to-use the OEM medium-height, quick-detach, picatinny/Weaver rings included.
Instead, I purchased a separate set-of Accushot, 1-inch, low-rings to keep the scope as low as possible.
The low-rings provided just-enough-clearance for the flipping scope caps to open-and-close.

The scope-and-rings are mounted on a Weaver Tactical, AR Flat-Top, 20MOA Riser Rail, model number 99675.
I employed a drooper-rail to avoid exceeding the scope adjustment range when zeroing at 10-meters.
Moreover, the inclined picatinny/Weaver rail is adapted-to the 1720T dovetail-groove with Leapers dovetail-to-picatinny rail adaptors. 
I believe the consistent-use of a single-source-OEM scope-mounting-components contributed to a very compatible bore-axis/scope-axis alignment.

After performing a rough-zero at approximately 10-yards/meters using Crosman Premier 7.9gr hollow-points.  
With the pistol fully-rested on soft-bags making for a solid and steady hold.
The hammer-spring-tension set-at maximum and the hammer-stroke adjusted for full-travel with a fill-pressure of 3K psi.
I took a few more shots at 15-yds to "confidence-check" my scope adjustments.
Then, I moved further downrange.

The target above was fired at 20-yds.
The POA was the center of the black-diamond.
Note how close the windage-zero adjustment @ 10-m translated-to @ 20-yds.
This proved-to-me that the consistent-use of a single-source OEM-components contribute-to consistent horizontal-axes alignment.

The above pink-dot aimpoint is 1/4-inch diameter @ 20-yds,
While performing final scope adjustment, I fired approximately seven quick-consecutive shoots.
One-shot at far-right may have been as-a-result of poor eye-scope alignment issue.
The shots, to-the-left were following another scope adjustment.

The above green-dot aimpoint is 1/4-inch diameter @ 20-yds.
This was after I performed an additional set-of scope adjustments.
And, I confirmed my final zero with these three-shots.

so it appears that pistol is almost impossible to load with that set up

my question is why would you do that to yourself, a smaller mount would move it forward and then you would only have the fight the scope 

heck you could get a scout style scope and move it forward away from the loading area and have enough eye relief to boot 

First, I considered an application-specific handgun scope.
However due to COVID-19 complications, the availability was indeterminate.
This being the case and considering I wanted to be able to take-shots at very close range ... the Bug Buster filled the bill.

I also wanted to avoid 10-meter zero problems for lack-of droop compensation.
As such, the sloped-rail ensured I wouldn't encounter that problem.

As-for loading, yes it is a bit-problematic ... but, not prohibitively difficult.
More-of an inconvenience that-is easily managed by-the-use of a "Pellet Pen" with the rubber-tip removed.
Even without a "pellet pen", it is not hard to "hand-load" a pellet.
It just takes a little-care and some-finesse. 

Further down the road, I'm considering adding an AR-15 type pistol-stock/arm-brace.
The addition of a stock/brace my entail moving the scope aft.
In any event, the scope-mount-system maybe subject to another configuration.
But for now, this set-up performs adequately for my purposes ... sparrow sniping at 15-to-25 yards.

The additional heft provided-by the scope, optic rings, drooper-rail and dovetail-to-picatinny adapters has altered the handling dynamics of the 1720T.
My 1720T with peep-sights and picatinny-rails was balanced sufficiently muzzle-heavy to-hold the front-sight steady.
The same could not be said about my optics equipped 1720.

The increased-weight of the optics are set more-aft with the results being a more-neutral weight distribution.
This concentration-of-mass more-towards the receiver contributes-to a less-stable muzzle.
To-the-point, the barrel feels a-bit-flickery just-as the out-of-the-box trigger left-off is about to occur.

Not-good when your optic is set at 12-power and the target is a small sparrow with a center-mass hold at 23-yards.
It can be done ... but, it ain't easy - a real challenge in-deed.
If the target is a Eurasian-dove at about 25-yard, the shot is easier.

I've done both with center-mass holds.
And, found the 1720 was way-over-kill on a sparrow.
While being a little-on the weak-side after impacting a full-size Eurasian dove in the breast - tough flight muscles.
Kinda reminded-me of the damage a Crosman 2100 at full compression inflects on birds. 
But, the shrouded-barrel 1720T is definitely quieter.

I have the same pistol,love it;Custom grips help my hold,I have a Burris 3X7X32  pistol scope .I use two pc.medium mounts on it.

 My Prod has a SC carbine stock,I use the Bug Buster on that "pistol"also works out great.

@aom22

Is that a single shot tray i see in your picture ?

                                         Close-up of loading port ... single-shot tray

     Close-up of scope-cap clearance between picatinny rail

@aom22

Clever. I'm impressed with your scope set up as you have the scope in very a good location.

I have a MK 1 LD that I mounted a Bug Buster but had to clear loading port by 5/8".

@crazyhorse
Awwww ... I wouldn't say clever.  
Rather, a lesson-learned from my experience-with one-of my other 1720Ts.
I didn't want to contend-with a scope that is overly-high.
Take-note in the photo below.
The cheekpiece is extended as-high as possible ... still, not quite high-enough for me.

The lower-profile of the Weaver Tactical, AR Flat-Top, 20MOA Riser Rail, model number 99675 along-with low-rings.
Place the scope at a much-more usable-level for me.  

Crosman 1720T Snub-Nose, 4.5-to-5FPE, Lothar-Walter Barrel,Challenger Stock, First-Generation Marauder Trigger
NOT-Regulated (the HUMA stick belongs on other 1720T)  
Leapers 3-12X32 Bug Buster, Hawke 1-inch Weaver Low Rings, Leapers Drooper Mount.

In due time, I'll probably will-be converting my Snub-Nose 1720T to the Weaver Tactical, AR Flat-Top, 20MOA Riser Rail set-up.

how about some fancy wood 

Shoulder stock for handguns (formgriffe.de)

Universal grip, with thumb rest and finger grooves (formgriffe.de)

Actually,I'm looking at something more minimalistic.
AR-15 Pistol Buffer Tube Assembly

RAI-AOO1 Adjustable Stock Adapter for Crosman air pistol
By the way, if ya have a spare A001, I sure could use it.

I already have two full-stocked 1720Ts

Crosman 1720T Compact, 9-FPE, Huma Regulator, Lothar-Walther Barrel, Challenger Stock, First-Generation Marauder Trigger
Moderator Extension, CP 3-12X44 Spectrum / Sun Optics MED Fully-Adjustable Mounts

Crosman 1720T Snub-Nose, 4.5-to-5 FPE, Lothar-Walter Barrel,Challenger Stock, First-Generation Marauder Trigger
NOT-Regulated (the HUMA stick belongs on other 1720T)  
Leapers 3-12X32 Bug Buster, Hawke 1-inch Weaver Low-Rings, Leapers Drooper Mount.

Tags

Crosman · 1720T · Pistol · Review

We use cookies to see how visitors find and use this site, mainly page views and general traffic patterns, so we can improve the guide over time. No personal data is sold. See our Privacy Policy for details.